Bahinipaty v. Educational Medical, Inc.

Ninth Circuit

Bahinipaty v. Educational Medical, Inc.

94 F.3d 650, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37489, 1996 WL 465763

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedAugust 14, 1996

Docket95-55487

StatusUnpublished

This text of 94 F.3d 650 (Bahinipaty v. Educational Medical, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bahinipaty v. Educational Medical, Inc., 94 F.3d 650, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37489, 1996 WL 465763 (9th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

94 F.3d 650

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Lingaraj BAHINIPATY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
EDUCATIONAL MEDICAL, INC., a Delaware corporation; Maric
College of Medical Careers, a subsidiary of EMI; Gary
Kerber; Vince Pisano; Gerry Taylor; Lee Haroun, et al.
and DOES 1 to 50, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-55487.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 8, 1996.*
Decided Aug. 14, 1996.

Before: D.W. NELSON, T.G. NELSON, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

A Court of Appeals reviews an award of sanctions under the inherent power of the district court for an abuse of discretion. Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 55, 111 S.Ct. 2123, 2138, 115 L.Ed.2d 27 (1991). After a careful review of the record and consideration of the briefs submitted by the parties, we AFFIRM the district court's award of sanctions.

*

The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to 9th Cir.R. 34-4 and Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

94 F.3d 650

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Lingaraj BAHINIPATY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
EDUCATIONAL MEDICAL, INC., a Delaware corporation; Maric
College of Medical Careers, a subsidiary of EMI; Gary
Kerber; Vince Pisano; Gerry Taylor; Lee Haroun, et al.
and DOES 1 to 50, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-55487.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 8, 1996.*
Decided Aug. 14, 1996.

Before: D.W. NELSON, T.G. NELSON, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

A Court of Appeals reviews an award of sanctions under the inherent power of the district court for an abuse of discretion. Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 55, 111 S.Ct. 2123, 2138, 115 L.Ed.2d 27 (1991). After a careful review of the record and consideration of the briefs submitted by the parties, we AFFIRM the district court's award of sanctions.

*

The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to 9th Cir.R. 34-4 and Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 F.3d 650, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37489, 1996 WL 465763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bahinipaty-v-educational-medical-inc-ca9-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack