Bah v. Wells Fargo Bank NA

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: December 22, 2010
• Docket: 09-2217
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2217

MICHELLE JOHNSON BAH; MOUNTAGA BAH,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK NA,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

HSBC BANK USA; DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY; REAL TIME RESOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED; WELLS FARGO BANK WEST N.A.; HUD,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:08- cv-03429-RWT)

Submitted: December 9, 2010 Decided: December 22, 2010

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary E. Goulet, WHITHAM, CURTIS, CHRISTOFFERSON & COOK, P.C., Reston, Virginia, for Appellants. Amy S. Owen, Elizabeth S. Finberg, COCHRAN & OWEN, L.L.C., Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michelle Johnson Bah and Mountaga Bah appeal from the

district court’s order dismissing their civil action, pursuant

to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), in which they sought to prevent

foreclosure proceedings against their home. We have reviewed

the record and the parties’ briefs, and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Bah v. Wells Fargo Bank NA, No. 8:08-cv-03429-

RWT (D. Md. Sept. 23, 2009). We deny the Appellee’s motion to

strike and for sanctions, and we dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED