Bagnall v. Davies

2 N.E. 786, 140 Mass. 76, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 283
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedSeptember 3, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 2 N.E. 786 (Bagnall v. Davies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bagnall v. Davies, 2 N.E. 786, 140 Mass. 76, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 283 (Mass. 1885).

Opinion

W. Allen, J.

It is admitted that the plaintiff has a right to enforce the restriction in the defendant’s deed, that no building shall be erected on her lot within twenty feet of Clifford Street. The only question is whether the defendant’s house is within twenty feet of the street.

The front, of the house is toward Clifford Street, and the front' wall is twenty feet from the street. A part of the roof, which slopes toward the street, is extended to within less than fourteen feet of it, covering a piazza and supported by posts six feet from the front wall of the house. In this part of the roof is a dormer window, by which a room in the second story is extended to within seventeen feet of the street. We think that these portions of the roof and of the dormer window which extend beyond the front wall towards the street are extensions of the building, and a part of it within twenty feet of the street, within the meaning of the restriction. See Sanborn v. Rice, 129 Mass. 387; Manners v. Johnson, 1 Ch. D. 673.

Decree for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Turner v. Standard Oil Co. of Kentucky
140 S.E.2d 208 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1965)
Olson v. Zoning Board of Appeal
84 N.E.2d 544 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1949)
Gilbert v. Repertory, Inc.
18 N.E.2d 437 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1939)
Miller v. American Unitarian Ass'n
171 P. 520 (Washington Supreme Court, 1918)
Brandenburg v. Lager
272 Ill. 622 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1916)
Ocean City Land Co. v. Weber
91 A. 600 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1914)
Alderson v. Cutting
126 P.2d 157 (California Supreme Court, 1912)
Loud v. Pendergast
92 N.E. 40 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1910)
Codman v. Bradley
87 N.E. 591 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1909)
Bader v. Walther
5 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 497 (Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court, 1907)
Reardon v. Murphy
40 N.E. 854 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)
Hamlen v. Werner
11 N.E. 684 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1887)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 N.E. 786, 140 Mass. 76, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bagnall-v-davies-mass-1885.