Bagnall v. Bagnall
This text of 616 So. 2d 1131 (Bagnall v. Bagnall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this appeal from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage, Mr. Bagnall contends that the trial court improperly imputed unemployment compensation income to him from unemployment benefits for which he is not eligible. The written order is ambiguous as to the source of the imputed income.1 If the husband is not entitled to unemployment benefits, imputing such benefits would be erroneous. The final order is reversed and remanded for a clarification as to the source of the imputed income.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
616 So. 2d 1131, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4130, 1993 WL 107983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bagnall-v-bagnall-fladistctapp-1993.