Home/Second Circuit/Baglin v. Cusenier Co.

Baglin v. Cusenier Co.

173 F. 1019, 97 C.C.A. 666, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5126
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided November 8, 1909·No. No. 205·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are satisfied it was error to hold defendant in contempt for translating the whole or any part of the label which the court said it might use; the court having expressly stated that such label might be translated into any language. No mistranslation is proved. Order reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baglin v. Cusenier Co., 173 F. 1019, 97 C.C.A. 666, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5126 (2d Cir. 1909).

173 F. 1019 (Baglin v. Cusenier Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.