Baglin v. Cusenier Co.
173 F. 1019, 97 C.C.A. 666, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5126
This text of 173 F. 1019 (Baglin v. Cusenier Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Baglin v. Cusenier Co., 173 F. 1019, 97 C.C.A. 666, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5126 (2d Cir. 1909).
Opinion
We are satisfied it was error to hold defendant in contempt for translating the whole or any part of the label which the court said it might use; the court having expressly stated that such label might be translated into any language. No mistranslation is proved. Order reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
173 F. 1019, 97 C.C.A. 666, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baglin-v-cusenier-co-ca2-1909.