Bagley v. Stern
92 N.Y.S. 244
This text of 92 N.Y.S. 244 (Bagley v. Stern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bagley v. Stern, 92 N.Y.S. 244 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).
Opinion
Under the judge’s charge the jury were allowed to include interest in the amount they found due. Since the action was for unliquidated damages, this was error. It is impossible to say from the verdict that the jury did not allow interest, and the judgment must therefore be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
92 N.Y.S. 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bagley-v-stern-nyappterm-1905.