Bagley v. Stern
92 N.Y.S. 244
Opinion
Under the judge’s charge the jury were allowed to include interest in the amount they found due. Since the action was for unliquidated damages, this was error. It is impossible to say from the verdict that the jury did not allow interest, and the judgment must therefore be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bagley v. Stern, 92 N.Y.S. 244 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).
92 N.Y.S. 244 (Bagley v. Stern) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.