Bagley v. State

157 S.E. 904, 43 Ga. App. 105, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 206
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 1, 1931·No. 21038·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

The only question raised by the record in this case is whether or not the evidence sustains the defendant’s conviction for using profane language in the presence of a female. There is positive evidence that the defendant did use profane language in the presenc of and to a female, and the evidence is conflicting as to whether or not he had sufficient provocation to absolve him from guilt under the statute. In these circumstances the sufficiency of the provocation was a jury question, and this court is without authority to disturb the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bagley v. State, 157 S.E. 904, 43 Ga. App. 105, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 206 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

157 S.E. 904 (Bagley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Raines v. State
36 S.E.2d 64 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1945)