Bagley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Bagley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

101 Mich. App. 733

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 22, 1980

DocketDocket No. 46760

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 101 Mich. App. 733 (Bagley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bagley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 101 Mich. App. 733 (Mich. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff appeals from a circuit court opinion of July 10, 1979, and order of August 2, 1979, which granted summary judgment in favor of defendant in plaintiff’s declaratory judgment action. The issue raised on appeal was whether the Legislature intended that § 3109(1) of the Michigan no-fault insurance act, MCL 500.3109(1); MSA 24.13109(1), apply to medical and disability benefits which the plaintiff received from the Army and Veterans’ Administration as a result of the automobile accident. We find that the Legislature clearly intended the section to apply to such benefits. O’Donnell v State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins Co, 404 Mich 524; 273 NW2d 829 (1979), Beaver v Auto-Owners Ins Co, Inc, 93 Mich App 399; 286 NW2d 884 (1979).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff appeals from a circuit court opinion of July 10, 1979, and order of August 2, 1979, which granted summary judgment in favor of defendant in plaintiff’s declaratory judgment action. The issue raised on appeal was whether the Legislature intended that § 3109(1) of the Michigan no-fault insurance act, MCL 500.3109(1); MSA 24.13109(1), apply to medical and disability benefits which the plaintiff received from the Army and Veterans’ Administration as a result of the automobile accident. We find that the Legislature clearly intended the section to apply to such benefits. O’Donnell v State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins Co, 404 Mich 524; 273 NW2d 829 (1979), Beaver v Auto-Owners Ins Co, Inc, 93 Mich App 399; 286 NW2d 884 (1979).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 Mich. App. 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bagley-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-michctapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack