Bagley Acquisition Corporation v. Homrich Wrecking, Inc.
771 N.W.2d 768
This text of 771 N.W.2d 768 (Bagley Acquisition Corporation v. Homrich Wrecking, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bagley Acquisition Corporation v. Homrich Wrecking, Inc., 771 N.W.2d 768 (Mich. 2009).
Opinion
BAGLEY ACQUISITION CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HOMRICH WRECKING, INC., d/b/a Homrich, Inc., Defendant-Appellee, and
Auto Club Group, City of Detroit, Detroit Economic Growth Corporation, and State of Michigan, Defendants.
Bagley Acquisition Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Homrich Wrecking, Inc., d/b/a Homrich, Inc., Defendant-Appellee, and
Auto Club Group, City of Detroit, Detroit Economic Growth Corporation, and State of Michigan, Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
*769 Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 19, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Graham
771 N.W.2d 768 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
771 N.W.2d 768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bagley-acquisition-corporation-v-homrich-wrecking-inc-mich-2009.