Bagley 885214 v. Jamros

District Court, W.D. Michigan·Decided January 19, 2022·No. 2:20-cv-00150·Unknown

Opinion

NORTHERN DIVISION

KEITH BAGLEY #885214

Plaintiff, File no: 2:20-cv-150 v. HON. ROBERT J. JONKER WENDY JAMROS,

Defendant. /

ORDER APPROVING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action on December 20, 2021 (ECF No. 35). The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 35) is approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Jamros’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 28) is GRANTED to the extent detailed in the Report and Recommendation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Bagley’s motion for a temporary restraining order (ECF No. 32) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims are dismissed with prejudice and this matter is terminated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is denied a certificate of appealability. The Court discerns no good-faith basis for appeal of this matter. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 611 (6th Cir. 1997); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Dated: January 19, 2022 /s/ Robert J. Jonker

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bagley 885214 v. Jamros, (W.D. Mich. 2022).

Bagley 885214 v. Jamros (Bagley 885214 v. Jamros) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related