Bagienski v. Bagienski

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bagienski v. Bagienski

902 So. 2d 978, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9103, 2005 WL 1335247

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 8, 2005·No. No. 4D04-290·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the Final Judgment appealed on all issues raised. We write only on the entitlement to permanent periodic alimony holding that appellee, wife, has the present need for permanent periodic alimony and appellant, husband, has the present ability to pay.

Recognizing that the case is a close one, we affirm as to the amount. The husband’s expenses are low, because he has been living with his parents. A change in these circumstances may well justify a downward modification of alimony.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the Final Judgment appealed on all issues raised. We write only on the entitlement to permanent periodic alimony holding that appellee, wife, has the present need for permanent periodic alimony and appellant, husband, has the present ability to pay.

Recognizing that the case is a close one, we affirm as to the amount. The husband’s expenses are low, because he has been living with his parents. A change in these circumstances may well justify a downward modification of alimony.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Bagienski v. Bagienski, 902 So. 2d 978, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9103, 2005 WL 1335247 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

902 So. 2d 978 (Bagienski v. Bagienski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.