Baggs v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Baggs v. State

158 S.E. 803, 43 Ga. App. 427, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 403

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 9, 1931

Docket21465

StatusPublished

This text of 158 S.E. 803 (Baggs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baggs v. State, 158 S.E. 803, 43 Ga. App. 427, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 403 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Bboyxes, C. J.

The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and under the particular facts of the case the special grounds of the motion for a new trial (complaining of three excerpts from the charge of the court) show no error requiring a reversal of the judgment. The cases cited in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error are distinguishable by their facts from this ease, and, therefore, the rulings made therein are not applicable ■ here.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., eoneurs. Bloodioorth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bboyxes, C. J.

The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and under the particular facts of the case the special grounds of the motion for a new trial (complaining of three excerpts from the charge of the court) show no error requiring a reversal of the judgment. The cases cited in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error are distinguishable by their facts from this ease, and, therefore, the rulings made therein are not applicable ■ here.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., eoneurs. Bloodioorth, J., absent on account of illness.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

158 S.E. 803, 43 Ga. App. 427, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baggs-v-state-gactapp-1931.