Baggs v. Smith

53 Cal. 88
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1878·No. No. 5802·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

By the Court :

The findings filed June 4th, 1877, are insufficient to support the judgment entered on that day, in that they did not respond to the issue joined upon the counter-claim of the defendant for the alleged loan of moneys to the plaintiffs. It is the settled rule that the material issues made by the pleadings must be responded to by the findings.

The order of August 6th, 1877, amending the findings, was [90] also erroneous, if for no other, for the reason that the cause was then pending in this Court upon appeal from the judgment, and under such circumstances the Court below had no authority to make new or further findings in the cause.

Judgment and order of August 6th, 1877, reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baggs v. Smith, 53 Cal. 88 (Cal. 1878).

53 Cal. 88 (Baggs v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Vernon v. City of Los Angeles
290 P.2d 841 (California Supreme Court, 1955)
Jump v. Barr
189 P. 334 (California Court of Appeal, 1920)
Egbert v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co.
1915 OK 601 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
In re Bullard's Estate
31 P. 1119 (California Supreme Court, 1892)
Corinne Mill, Canal, & Stock Co. v. Johnston
5 Utah 147 (Utah Supreme Court, 1887)
Hayes v. Wetherbee
60 Cal. 396 (California Supreme Court, 1882)
People v. Center
54 Cal. 236 (California Supreme Court, 1880)
Knight v. Roche
56 Cal. 15 (California Supreme Court, 1880)
Wells, Fargo & Co. v. Smith
2 Utah 39 (Utah Supreme Court, 1880)