Baggett v. Wiman

Fifth Circuit

Baggett v. Wiman

311 F.2d 564

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 3, 1963

DocketNo. 19991

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 311 F.2d 564 (Baggett v. Wiman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baggett v. Wiman, 311 F.2d 564 (5th Cir. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the denial by the trial court of a writ of habeas corpus after a hearing by the trial court. It appearing that at the time of the trial which resulted in appellant’s conviction, the State Trial Court offered to appoint counsel for appellant and that he declined such appointment, we conclude that the trial court properly denied relief sought under the rule of Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 73 S.Ct. 397, 97 L.Ed. 469.

The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the denial by the trial court of a writ of habeas corpus after a hearing by the trial court. It appearing that at the time of the trial which resulted in appellant’s conviction, the State Trial Court offered to appoint counsel for appellant and that he declined such appointment, we conclude that the trial court properly denied relief sought under the rule of Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 73 S.Ct. 397, 97 L.Ed. 469.

The judgment is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

311 F.2d 564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baggett-v-wiman-ca5-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack