Baggett v. Wiman

Fifth Circuit

Baggett v. Wiman

311 F.2d 564

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 3, 1963·No. No. 19991·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PEE CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the denial by the trial court of a writ of habeas corpus after a hearing by the trial court. It appearing that at the time of the trial which resulted in appellant’s conviction, the State Trial Court offered to appoint counsel for appellant and that he declined such appointment, we conclude that the trial court properly denied relief sought under the rule of Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 73 S.Ct. 397, 97 L.Ed. 469.

The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the denial by the trial court of a writ of habeas corpus after a hearing by the trial court. It appearing that at the time of the trial which resulted in appellant’s conviction, the State Trial Court offered to appoint counsel for appellant and that he declined such appointment, we conclude that the trial court properly denied relief sought under the rule of Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 73 S.Ct. 397, 97 L.Ed. 469.

The judgment is

Affirmed.

Baggett v. Wiman, 311 F.2d 564 (5th Cir. 1963).

Pincite

311 F.2d 564 (Baggett v. Wiman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related