Baggett v. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance

277 S.W. 78, 115 Tex. 144
Texas Supreme Court·Decided November 18, 1925·No. Application No. 14219·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The only thing absent from the copy of the application which was attached to the policy was the signature of Baggett. There is no contention that it was not in all other respects a substantial copy of the original application. Under the circumstances, the absence of the signature becomes immaterial. Baggett having offered in evidence all of the policy except the application, the whole was admissible when offered by the Insurance Company. The Court of Civil Appeals having made a correct disposition of the case, the writ of error is refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baggett v. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance, 277 S.W. 78, 115 Tex. 144 (Tex. 1925).

277 S.W. 78 (Baggett v. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.