Bagby v. Reeves
20 Ala. 427
Opinion
There can be no doubt that tbe money arising from tbe sale of tbe lands levied on by tbe sheriff, was rightly appropriated by the judgment and direction of tbe court below. Tbe judgment of tbe Branch Bank was nearly two years prior in point of time to that in favor of tbe plaintiff in error. It created the first lien, and was consequently entitled to priority of satisfaction. Campbell v. Spence, 4 Ala. 543; Quinn v. Wiswall, 7 ib. 645.
Let tbe judgment be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bagby v. Reeves, 20 Ala. 427 (Ala. 1852).
20 Ala. 427 (Bagby v. Reeves) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Caldwell v. Houser
108 Ala. 125 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1895)
Decatur Charcoal Chemical Works v. Moses
89 Ala. 538 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1889)
Lancaster v. Jordan
78 Ala. 197 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1884)
Pettit v. Black
13 Neb. 142 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1882)
Hendon v. White
52 Ala. 597 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1875)