Bafford v. Midfirst Bank
181 L. Ed. 2d 19, 132 S. Ct. 89, 565 U.S. 812, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6915, 80 U.S.L.W. 3181
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bafford v. Midfirst Bank. Read the opinion of the Court — 181 L. Ed. 2d 425 →
Opinion
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 24, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bafford v. Midfirst Bank, 181 L. Ed. 2d 19, 132 S. Ct. 89, 565 U.S. 812, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 6915, 80 U.S.L.W. 3181 (U.S. 2011).
181 L. Ed. 2d 19 (Bafford v. Midfirst Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.