Baez v. Potamkin Hyundai, Inc.

Eleventh Circuit

Baez v. Potamkin Hyundai, Inc.

458 F. App'x 827

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedFebruary 16, 2012

DocketNo. 11-13568

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 458 F. App'x 827 (Baez v. Potamkin Hyundai, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baez v. Potamkin Hyundai, Inc., 458 F. App'x 827 (11th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The rulings of the District Court in granting the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; in denying the Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; and in dismissing the Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint are affirmed for the reasons set forth in the June 14, 2011 Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, which was adopted by the District Court on July 11, 2011.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The rulings of the District Court in granting the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; in denying the Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; and in dismissing the Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint are affirmed for the reasons set forth in the June 14, 2011 Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, which was adopted by the District Court on July 11, 2011.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

458 F. App'x 827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baez-v-potamkin-hyundai-inc-ca11-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack