Baez v. Orsini

6 P.R. 137

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico·Decided April 4, 1904·No. No. 5·Published

Opinion

Mr Chief Justice Quiñoees,

after making the above statement of facts, delivered the opinion of the court.

The findings of fact and conclusions of law conltained in the judgment appealed from are accepted.

In view of the legal provisions cited therein, we adjudge that we should affirm and do affirm the aforesaid judgment, with costs against appellant.

Justices Hernández, Fignerás and MacLeary concurred. Mr. Justice Sulzbacher did not sit at the hearing of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr Chief Justice Quiñoees,

after making the above statement of facts, delivered the opinion of the court.

The findings of fact and conclusions of law conltained in the judgment appealed from are accepted.

In view of the legal provisions cited therein, we adjudge that we should affirm and do affirm the aforesaid judgment, with costs against appellant.

Justices Hernández, Fignerás and MacLeary concurred. Mr. Justice Sulzbacher did not sit at the hearing of this case.

Baez v. Orsini, 6 P.R. 137 (prsupreme 1904).

Pincite

6 P.R. 137 (Baez v. Orsini) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.