Baez v. Martinez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Baez v. Martinez

255 A.D.2d 131, 679 N.Y.S.2d 576, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11716

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 10, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order, Family Court, New York County (Richard Ross, J.), entered on or about May 23, 1997, which, upon a finding that respondent had violated an order of protection, extended said order of protection for a period of 1 year, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Contrary to respondent husband’s contention, the record amply supports Family Court’s finding that respondent violated the subject order of protection by slapping petitioner in the [132] face. The credibility determinations of the Family Court in connection with this finding should be accorded deference and we see no basis to disturb them (see, Matter of F.B. v W.B., 248 AD2d 119). Concur — Lerner, P. J., Sullivan, Nardelli and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Family Court, New York County (Richard Ross, J.), entered on or about May 23, 1997, which, upon a finding that respondent had violated an order of protection, extended said order of protection for a period of 1 year, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Contrary to respondent husband’s contention, the record amply supports Family Court’s finding that respondent violated the subject order of protection by slapping petitioner in the [132] face. The credibility determinations of the Family Court in connection with this finding should be accorded deference and we see no basis to disturb them (see, Matter of F.B. v W.B., 248 AD2d 119). Concur — Lerner, P. J., Sullivan, Nardelli and Rubin, JJ.

Baez v. Martinez, 255 A.D.2d 131, 679 N.Y.S.2d 576, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11716 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

255 A.D.2d 131 (Baez v. Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related