Baez v. Goord

284 A.D.2d 702, 726 N.Y.S.2d 305, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6200

This text of 284 A.D.2d 702 (Baez v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baez v. Goord, 284 A.D.2d 702, 726 N.Y.S.2d 305, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6200 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Contrary to petitioner’s contentions, he has received all the relief to which he is entitled (see, Matter of Hernandez v Goord, 279 AD2d 919; Matter of Stephens v Central Off. Review Comm. of N. Y. State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 255 AD2d 845; Matter of Johnson v Smith, 112 AD2d 50, affd 66 NY2d 697). Accordingly, the matter is dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Holmes v Selsky, 283 AD2d 754; Matter of Curtis v Goord, 274 AD2d 808).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Spain, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., [703]*703concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Smith
487 N.E.2d 282 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Johnson v. Smith
112 A.D.2d 50 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Stephens v. Central Office Review Committee of New York State Department of Correctional Services
255 A.D.2d 845 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Curtis v. Goord
274 A.D.2d 808 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Hernandez v. Goord
279 A.D.2d 919 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Holmes v. Selsky
283 A.D.2d 754 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
284 A.D.2d 702, 726 N.Y.S.2d 305, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baez-v-goord-nyappdiv-2001.