Baez v. 2347 Morris Realty, Inc.

69 A.D.3d 480, 891 N.Y.2d 646
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 19, 2010·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

An issue of fact as to the foreseeability of the rape is raised by the printouts of police reports and complaints submitted by plaintiff tending to show prior violent criminal activity in or near the subject building, including attacks, as well as prior drug arrests in front of the building, and by plaintiffs testimony that she and other tenants regularly complained to the superin[481] tendent about criminal activity and loiterers in the building (see Jacqueline S. v City of New York, 81 NY2d 288, 295 [1993]; Rivera v 1652 Popham Assoc., LLC, 31 AD3d 297, 298 [2006]; Wayburn v Madison Land Ltd. Partnership, 282 AD2d 301, 303-304 [2001]). We have considered defendant’s other arguments and find them unavailing. We note the absence of argument by defendant on the issue of causation. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.E, Saxe, Acosta, DeGrasse and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baez v. 2347 Morris Realty, Inc., 69 A.D.3d 480, 891 N.Y.2d 646 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

69 A.D.3d 480 (Baez v. 2347 Morris Realty, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crandall v. Equinox Holdings, Inc.
2024 NY Slip Op 04902 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Carasquilo v. Macombs Village Associates
99 A.D.3d 455 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Ungruhe v. Blake-Riv Realty LLC
90 A.D.3d 497 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)