Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Baez-Ferreira v. Marte

Baez-Ferreira v. Marte

86 A.D.3d 434, 926 N.Y.2d 291
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 7, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 86 A.D.3d 434 (Baez-Ferreira v. Marte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baez-Ferreira v. Marte, 86 A.D.3d 434, 926 N.Y.2d 291 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

The appeal is dismissed because no appeal lies from an order granted on default (see Figiel v Met Food, 48 AD3d 330 [2008]; [435]*435CPLR 5511). Defendant’s remedy was an application to the motion court to vacate the order (see Figiel at 330; CPLR 5015 [a] [1]).

However, were we to reach the merits we would affirm. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Catterson, DeGrasse, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hodson v. Vinnie's Farm Market
103 A.D.3d 549 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 A.D.3d 434, 926 N.Y.2d 291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baez-ferreira-v-marte-nyappdiv-2011.