Baesler v. N.D. Department of Transportation
Opinion
Filed 2/17/12 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2012 ND 22
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Raunlyn Scott Marsette, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20110285
Appeal from the District Court of McLean County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Ladd R. Erickson, State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 1108, Washburn, ND 58577-
1108, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Kent M. Morrow, 411 North 4th Street, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, ND 58502-
2155, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
State v. Marsette
No. 20110285
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Raunlyn Marsette appeals from a district court judgment entered after he conditionally pled guilty to driving under the influence. On appeal, Marsette argues the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because the arresting officer did not have reasonable and articulable suspicion for the stop of Marsette’s vehicle. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2012 ND 39 (Baesler v. N.D. Department of Transportation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.