Baer v. Norene
79 F.2d 340, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4105
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 9, 1935·No. No. 7890·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
The petitioner was convicted of burglary in the second degree in 1917; later, in 1919, he was convicted of knowingly uttering a forged bank check; and still later, in 1921, was convicted of forgery of an indorsement on a check. The only contention raised by the appellant is that these crimes do not involve moral turpitude and therefore cannot form the basis for deportation. It is clear that these offenses involve moral turpitude.
The order of the lower court denying the applicatio'n of petitioner for writ of habeas corpus is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baer v. Norene, 79 F.2d 340, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4105 (9th Cir. 1935).
79 F.2d 340 (Baer v. Norene) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cetik v. Gonzales
181 F. App'x 117 (Second Circuit, 2006)
Enrique Cuevas-Gaspar v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General
430 F.3d 1013 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Cuevas-Gaspar v. Gonzales
Ninth Circuit, 2005