Baer v. Norene
This text of 79 F.2d 340 (Baer v. Norene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petitioner was convicted of burglary in the second degree in 1917; later, in 1919, he was convicted of knowingly uttering a forged bank check; and still later, in 1921, was convicted of forgery of an indorsement on a check. The only contention raised by the appellant is that these crimes do not involve moral turpitude and therefore cannot form the basis for deportation. It is clear that these offenses involve moral turpitude.
The order of the lower court denying the applicatio'n of petitioner for writ of habeas corpus is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
79 F.2d 340, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baer-v-norene-ca9-1935.