Baer v. Norene

79 F.2d 340, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4105
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 9, 1935
DocketNo. 7890
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 79 F.2d 340 (Baer v. Norene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baer v. Norene, 79 F.2d 340, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4105 (9th Cir. 1935).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner was convicted of burglary in the second degree in 1917; later, in 1919, he was convicted of knowingly uttering a forged bank check; and still later, in 1921, was convicted of forgery of an indorsement on a check. The only contention raised by the appellant is that these crimes do not involve moral turpitude and therefore cannot form the basis for deportation. It is clear that these offenses involve moral turpitude.

The order of the lower court denying the applicatio'n of petitioner for writ of habeas corpus is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cetik v. Gonzales
181 F. App'x 117 (Second Circuit, 2006)
Cuevas-Gaspar v. Gonzales
Ninth Circuit, 2005

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 F.2d 340, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baer-v-norene-ca9-1935.