Baer v. New York

384 U.S. 154, 86 S. Ct. 1380, 16 L. Ed. 2d 433, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1722
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 2, 1966·No. 1077·Published·Cited by 29 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baer v. New York, 384 U.S. 154, 86 S. Ct. 1380, 16 L. Ed. 2d 433, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1722 (1966).

384 U.S. 154 (Baer v. New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Grand Jury Investigation (90-3-2)
748 F. Supp. 1188 (E.D. Michigan, 1990)
Now v. Operation Rescue
747 F. Supp. 772 (District of Columbia, 1990)
Geary v. Renne
880 F.2d 1062 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)
United States v. Trinity Industries, Inc.
876 F.2d 1485 (Eleventh Circuit, 1989)
Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. Blain
808 F.2d 395 (Fifth Circuit, 1987)
Piambino v. Bestline Products, Inc.
645 F. Supp. 1210 (S.D. Florida, 1986)
Jackson v. Whitman
642 F. Supp. 816 (W.D. Louisiana, 1986)
Lance v. United States Department of Justice
610 F.2d 202 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
In Re Grand Jury Investigation.
610 F.2d 202 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
Green v. Burns
433 F. Supp. 219 (D. Rhode Island, 1977)
Squillacote v. Local 248, Meat & Allied Food Workers
534 F.2d 735 (Seventh Circuit, 1976)