Baer v. Kistler

4 Rawle 364, 1834 Pa. LEXIS 8
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 17, 1834·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam

This is one of those cases about which nothing is to be said, but to pronounce the law. Without then determining what may be the liability of the prothonotary’s sureties — a point not before us — it is sufficient for the occasion to say, that the officer was not the agent either of the party or the law, and that the receipt by him involved the debtor in a mispayment, which consequently cannot be set up as a discharge of the debt.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baer v. Kistler, 4 Rawle 364, 1834 Pa. LEXIS 8 (Pa. 1834).

4 Rawle 364 (Baer v. Kistler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rudd v. Gates
230 S.W. 906 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1921)
Holtzclaw v. Wells
179 S.W. 193 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1915)
Taylor v. Fox's Executors
173 S.W. 154 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1915)
Brown v. People
3 Colo. 115 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1876)