Baer v. Baer, No. Fa92 0124141 S (Oct. 5, 1994)

Connecticut Superior Court

Baer v. Baer, No. Fa92 0124141 S (Oct. 5, 1994)

1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 10123

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedOctober 5, 1994

DocketNo. FA92 0124141 S

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 10123 (Baer v. Baer, No. Fa92 0124141 S (Oct. 5, 1994)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baer v. Baer, No. Fa92 0124141 S (Oct. 5, 1994), 1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 10123 (Colo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTIONS #129 AND #140 Both motions involve the defendant's request for legal fees. The first motion seeks fees to defend against the plaintiff's motion for order dated March 15, 1994 (#129), and the second motion asks for fees to defend the plaintiff's appeal of the court's decision on the first motion (#140).

The court has considered the criteria set forth in Connecticut General Statutes § 46b-62 in reaching its decision. The court has reviewed the court's file of the case, including the Memorandum of Decision of the trial court; the financial affidavits of the parties; the testimony presented and the arguments and briefs of counsel.

The defendant is receiving alimony and child support in the monthly amount of $37,500.00 or $450,000.00 on an annual basis. The defendant's claim that she does not have ample liquid funds to pay fees is suspect when she voluntarily elects to operate a horse farm at an annual loss of $72,000.00

Both motions are denied.

NOVACK, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI