Baecher v. Baecher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Baecher v. Baecher

70 A.D.2d 871, 417 N.Y.S.2d 212, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12442

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 4, 1979

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 70 A.D.2d 871 (Baecher v. Baecher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baecher v. Baecher, 70 A.D.2d 871, 417 N.Y.S.2d 212, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12442 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a matrimonial action in which the plaintiff was previously granted a judgment of divorce, defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 27, 1978, as (1) granted plaintiff’s motion for entry of a money judgment of $7,030 for accrued arrears in alimony and child support, without a hearing, and (2) denied defendant’s cross motion to consolidate plaintiffs motion with his prior application for downward modification of the alimony and support provisions contained in the judgment of divorce. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or dibursements, and the defendant’s cross motion is granted to the extent that the branch of plaintiff’s motion which seeks entry of a judgment for arrears is consolidated with defendant’s application for downward modification. A consolidated hearing should be held forthwith to resolve both issues. The interest of justice requires that all applications in this matter be heard together expeditiously. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Titone and Mangano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a matrimonial action in which the plaintiff was previously granted a judgment of divorce, defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 27, 1978, as (1) granted plaintiff’s motion for entry of a money judgment of $7,030 for accrued arrears in alimony and child support, without a hearing, and (2) denied defendant’s cross motion to consolidate plaintiffs motion with his prior application for downward modification of the alimony and support provisions contained in the judgment of divorce. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or dibursements, and the defendant’s cross motion is granted to the extent that the branch of plaintiff’s motion which seeks entry of a judgment for arrears is consolidated with defendant’s application for downward modification. A consolidated hearing should be held forthwith to resolve both issues. The interest of justice requires that all applications in this matter be heard together expeditiously. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Titone and Mangano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 A.D.2d 871, 417 N.Y.S.2d 212, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baecher-v-baecher-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack