Badoh v. Gonzales

Fourth Circuit

Badoh v. Gonzales

146 F. App'x 700

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 31, 2005·No. No. 04-2466·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lucy Jenkaa Badoh, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. The order in question affirmed a ruling of the immigration judge denying Badoh’s motion for reconsideration of the denial of her motion to reopen. We have reviewed the administrative record and the [701]*701Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in affirming the immigration judge’s decision. See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Lucy Jenkaa Badoh, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. The order in question affirmed a ruling of the immigration judge denying Badoh’s motion for reconsideration of the denial of her motion to reopen. We have reviewed the administrative record and the [701]*701Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in affirming the immigration judge’s decision. See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Badoh v. Gonzales, 146 F. App'x 700 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

146 F. App'x 700 (Badoh v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related