Badkey v. State

336 So. 2d 711, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15400
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 31, 1976·No. No. 75-733·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant takes a timely appeal from his plea of nolo contendere to possession of marijuana, specifically reserving his right to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. Appellant’s sole point argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress tangible evidence seized pursuant to an invalid inventory search.

Within the last year this court has considered a number of cases involving war-rantless inventory searches of automobile. State v. Jenkins, 319 So.2d 91 (Fla.4th DCA 1975); Weed v. Wainwright, 325 So.2d 44 (Fla.4th DCA 1976); Chuze v. State, 330 So.2d 166 (Fla.4th DCA 1976). Reviewing the present case in light of Jenkins, Weed and Chuze, supra, we conclude that the State failed to meet its burden of proof in showing the constitutional validity of this search. State v. Hinton, 305 So.2d 804 (Fla.4th DCA 1975). The trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion to suppress.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

WALDEN and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur. MAGER, C. J., concurs in conclusion only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Badkey v. State, 336 So. 2d 711, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15400 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

336 So. 2d 711 (Badkey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Jenkins
319 So. 2d 91 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
State v. Hinton
305 So. 2d 804 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Weed v. Wainwright
325 So. 2d 44 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Chuze v. State
330 So. 2d 166 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)