Badische Anilin & Soda Fabrik v. Matheson

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Badische Anilin & Soda Fabrik v. Matheson

94 F. 1021, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3117

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedJune 8, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 94 F. 1021 (Badische Anilin & Soda Fabrik v. Matheson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Badische Anilin & Soda Fabrik v. Matheson, 94 F. 1021, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3117 (circtsdny 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

Judge Coxa lias held this patent valid, having before him the very evidence as to the Casella German patent and as to the publica lions in this country on which defendant seems to rely. 94 Fed. 163. This court therefore starts with the proposition that the patent is valid, and, since it is not disputed that defendant’s product responds to all the tests of the patent, it must be held to be an infringement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

Judge Coxa lias held this patent valid, having before him the very evidence as to the Casella German patent and as to the publica lions in this country on which defendant seems to rely. 94 Fed. 163. This court therefore starts with the proposition that the patent is valid, and, since it is not disputed that defendant’s product responds to all the tests of the patent, it must be held to be an infringement.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 F. 1021, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/badische-anilin-soda-fabrik-v-matheson-circtsdny-1899.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack