Badische Anilin & Soda Fabrik v. Matheson

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Badische Anilin & Soda Fabrik v. Matheson

94 F. 1021, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3117

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided June 8, 1899·Published

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

Judge Coxa lias held this patent valid, having before him the very evidence as to the Casella German patent and as to the publica lions in this country on which defendant seems to rely. 94 Fed. 163. This court therefore starts with the proposition that the patent is valid, and, since it is not disputed that defendant’s product responds to all the tests of the patent, it must be held to be an infringement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

Judge Coxa lias held this patent valid, having before him the very evidence as to the Casella German patent and as to the publica lions in this country on which defendant seems to rely. 94 Fed. 163. This court therefore starts with the proposition that the patent is valid, and, since it is not disputed that defendant’s product responds to all the tests of the patent, it must be held to be an infringement.

Badische Anilin & Soda Fabrik v. Matheson, 94 F. 1021, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3117 (circtsdny 1899).

Pincite

94 F. 1021 (Badische Anilin & Soda Fabrik v. Matheson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related