Badillo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Badillo v. State

842 So. 2d 873, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 309, 2003 WL 131790

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 17, 2003

DocketNo. 2D02-790

StatusPublished

This text of 842 So. 2d 873 (Badillo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Badillo v. State, 842 So. 2d 873, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 309, 2003 WL 131790 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

DAVIS, Judge.

Jesus Badillo challenges the revocation of his probation, arguing that the trial court revoked his probation without conducting an evidentiary hearing or accepting an admission to the violation. We affirm the revocation without comment.

However, because the trial court did not enter a written revocation order setting forth the express probationary conditions that it found Badillo had violated, we remand for entry of an appropriate order. See McAffee v. State, 779 So.2d 299 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

Affirmed; remanded.

SALCINES and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI