Badillo v. State
842 So. 2d 873, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 309, 2003 WL 131790
Opinion
Jesus Badillo challenges the revocation of his probation, arguing that the trial court revoked his probation without conducting an evidentiary hearing or accepting an admission to the violation. We affirm the revocation without comment.
However, because the trial court did not enter a written revocation order setting forth the express probationary conditions that it found Badillo had violated, we remand for entry of an appropriate order. See McAffee v. State, 779 So.2d 299 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).
Affirmed; remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Badillo v. State, 842 So. 2d 873, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 309, 2003 WL 131790 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
842 So. 2d 873 (Badillo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McAffee v. State
779 So. 2d 299 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)