Badillo v. Eischen

CourtDistrict Court, D. Minnesota
DecidedJuly 8, 2025
Docket0:25-cv-00360
StatusUnknown

This text of Badillo v. Eischen (Badillo v. Eischen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Badillo v. Eischen, (mnd 2025).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Arnaldo Badillo, Civ. No. 25-360 (JWB/SGE)

Petitioner,

v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION B. Eischen, FPC Duluth, OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Respondent.

United States Magistrate Judge Shannon G. Elkins issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on May 27, 2025. (Doc. No. 11.) No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time permitted. Absent timely objections, the R&R is reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the R&R, no clear error is found. Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The May 27, 2025 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 11) is ACCEPTED; and 2. Petitioner Arnaldo Badillo’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Date: July 8, 2025 s/ Jerry W. Blackwell JERRY W. BLACKWELL United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Badillo v. Eischen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/badillo-v-eischen-mnd-2025.