Badillo v. Eischen

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Arnaldo Badillo, Civ. No. 25-360 (JWB/SGE)

Petitioner,

v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION B. Eischen, FPC Duluth, OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Respondent.

United States Magistrate Judge Shannon G. Elkins issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on May 27, 2025. (Doc. No. 11.) No objections have been filed to that R&R in the time permitted. Absent timely objections, the R&R is reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the R&R, no clear error is found. Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The May 27, 2025 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 11) is ACCEPTED; and 2. Petitioner Arnaldo Badillo’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Date: July 8, 2025 s/ Jerry W. Blackwell JERRY W. BLACKWELL United States District Judge