Badie v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Badie v. State

619 So. 2d 991, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5423, 1993 WL 143957

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 7, 1993

DocketNo. 92-1722

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 619 So. 2d 991 (Badie v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Badie v. State, 619 So. 2d 991, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5423, 1993 WL 143957 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Zachary Badie appeals from his conviction and sentence for burglary of a dwell[992]*992ing and grand theft which were entered after Badie pled nolo contendere. We find no merit to Badie’s appeal except for his contention that the court was without authority to order Badie to pay a $250 State Attorney’s fee as a special condition of probation. See Smith v. State, 606 So.2d 501 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Smith v. State, 606 So.2d 427 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). We therefore strike the provision in the order of probation requiring the payment of the State Attorney’s fee. Accordingly, we affirm Badie’s conviction and sentence as amended.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE AFFIRMED AS AMENDED.

GOSHORN, C.J., and W. SHARP and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Zachary Badie appeals from his conviction and sentence for burglary of a dwell[992]*992ing and grand theft which were entered after Badie pled nolo contendere. We find no merit to Badie’s appeal except for his contention that the court was without authority to order Badie to pay a $250 State Attorney’s fee as a special condition of probation. See Smith v. State, 606 So.2d 501 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Smith v. State, 606 So.2d 427 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). We therefore strike the provision in the order of probation requiring the payment of the State Attorney’s fee. Accordingly, we affirm Badie’s conviction and sentence as amended.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE AFFIRMED AS AMENDED.

GOSHORN, C.J., and W. SHARP and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

619 So. 2d 991, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5423, 1993 WL 143957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/badie-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack