Badgley v. Hedges

3 N.J.L. 233
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 15, 1807
StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.J.L. 233 (Badgley v. Hedges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Badgley v. Hedges, 3 N.J.L. 233 (N.J. 1807).

Opinion

By the Court.

— This judgment cannot be sustained. It is abundantly evident from the record, that the words charged in the three first counts were spoken in a Court of law, in the progress of a trial, and in a course of justice; that the language was uncivil, and merited the censure of the justice, before whom the testimony was given, is very clear; but they are not actionable; nothing is more common than for a party to say in his defence, that the evidence given against him is not true, and that he can prove it. Tlie three first counts, not containing a cause of action, and the testimony failing on the fourth count, there is nothing to support the judgment of the Common Pleas.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 N.J.L. 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/badgley-v-hedges-nj-1807.