Badgley v. Hare
385 U.S. 114, 87 S. Ct. 338, 17 L. Ed. 2d 207, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 181
Opinion
BADGLEY ET AL.
v.
HARE, SECRETARY OF STATE OF MICHIGAN, ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
William T. Gossett for appellants.
Frank J. Kelly, Attorney General of Michigan, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and Curtis G. Beck, Assistant Attorney General, for Hare; Theodore Sachs for Scholle et al., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Badgley v. Hare, 385 U.S. 114, 87 S. Ct. 338, 17 L. Ed. 2d 207, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 181 (1966).
385 U.S. 114 (Badgley v. Hare) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Apportionment, State Legislature-1992
486 N.W.2d 639 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1992)
Neff v. Secretary of State
439 Mich. 715 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1992)
Cummings v. Meskill
341 F. Supp. 139 (D. Connecticut, 1972)
Cousins v. City Council of City of Chicago
322 F. Supp. 428 (N.D. Illinois, 1971)
Skolnick v. Mayor of Chicago
319 F. Supp. 1219 (N.D. Illinois, 1970)
Wells v. Rockefeller
311 F. Supp. 48 (S.D. New York, 1970)
Sincock v. Gately
262 F. Supp. 739 (D. Delaware, 1967)