Badger Silver Min. Co. v. Drake
88 F. 48, 31 C.C.A. 378, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2063
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 12, 1898·No. No. 633·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
For the reasons given by the trial judge, and considering Willard v. Wood, 135 U. S. 309, 313, 10 Sup. Ct. 831, Cragin v. Lovell, 109 U. S. 194, 3 Sup. Ct. 132, Briggs v. Partridge, 64 N. Y. 358, and Haley v. Belting Co., 140 Mass. 73, 2 N. E. 785, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Badger Silver Min. Co. v. Drake, 88 F. 48, 31 C.C.A. 378, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2063 (5th Cir. 1898).
88 F. 48 (Badger Silver Min. Co. v. Drake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McMullen v. McMullen
145 So. 2d 568 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Hill v. Gratigny Plateau Development Corp.
52 F.2d 142 (Sixth Circuit, 1931)
Marks v. Kindel
41 F.2d 584 (Sixth Circuit, 1930)