Badger Mining Corporation v. Arturo Ayala

Court of Appeals of Texas

Badger Mining Corporation v. Arturo Ayala

DecidedSeptember 16, 2004

Docket13-04-00176-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Badger Mining Corporation v. Arturo Ayala (Badger Mining Corporation v. Arturo Ayala) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Badger Mining Corporation v. Arturo Ayala, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-04-176-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

BADGER MINING CORPORATION, Appellant,

v.

ARTURO AYALA, ET AL., Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 404th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yañez

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, BADGER MINING CORPORATION, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 404th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2004-01-167-G. After the record and appellant’s brief were filed, the parties filed a joint motion to reverse and remand. In the motion, the parties state that they have reached a settlement agreement in this matter. The parties request that: (1) the default judgments of the trial court against appellant Badger Mining Corporation be reversed and the orders granting the default judgments be vacated and set aside, and (2) the case be remanded to the trial court for a new trial on all issues in accordance with the parties’ agreement. The parties further request that the Court’s mandate issue immediately, ordering that the trial court observe the judgment of this Court reversing the default judgments in their entirety.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the parties’ joint motion, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The joint motion is granted, and the judgment of the trial court is hereby REVERSED and the cause is REMANDED to the trial court in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 16th day of September, 2004.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-04-176-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

BADGER MINING CORPORATION, Appellant,

v.

ARTURO AYALA, ET AL., Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 404th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yañez

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, BADGER MINING CORPORATION, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 404th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2004-01-167-G. After the record and appellant’s brief were filed, the parties filed a joint motion to reverse and remand. In the motion, the parties state that they have reached a settlement agreement in this matter. The parties request that: (1) the default judgments of the trial court against appellant Badger Mining Corporation be reversed and the orders granting the default judgments be vacated and set aside, and (2) the case be remanded to the trial court for a new trial on all issues in accordance with the parties’ agreement. The parties further request that the Court’s mandate issue immediately, ordering that the trial court observe the judgment of this Court reversing the default judgments in their entirety.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the parties’ joint motion, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The joint motion is granted, and the judgment of the trial court is hereby REVERSED and the cause is REMANDED to the trial court in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 16th day of September, 2004.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Badger Mining Corporation v. Arturo Ayala, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/badger-mining-corporation-v-arturo-ayala-texapp-2004.