Badesire Bahindwa v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 29, 2019·No. 04-18-00693-CR·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas May 29, 2019

No. 04-18-00693-CR

Badesire BAHINDWA, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016CR5024 The Honorable Mark Luitjen, Judge Presiding

ORDER Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Irene Rios, Justice

Appellant has filed a pro se motion requesting the appointment of counsel. Appellant is represented by Michael S. Raign, who has filed an Anders brief in this appeal and whose motion to withdraw has been held in abeyance. See In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 410–11 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (“Under the Anders procedure, the motion to withdraw will not be granted until the appellate court decides whether the appeal is, in fact, wholly frivolous, or whether there are any arguable claims of merit. In either event, the motion to withdraw will then be granted and either the appeal will be [disposed of] or the case abated to the trial court for appointment of new counsel.”). By order dated January 9, 2019, appellant was ordered to file his pro se brief by March 11, 2019. No pro se brief was filed, and the appeal is set to be submitted on July 9, 2019. Appellant’s motion is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on May 29, 2019.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Badesire Bahindwa v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Badesire Bahindwa v. State (Badesire Bahindwa v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Schulman
252 S.W.3d 403 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2008)