Badesha v. Soch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Badesha v. Soch

104 A.D.3d 1268, 960 N.Y.S.2d 920

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 22, 2013

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 104 A.D.3d 1268 (Badesha v. Soch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Badesha v. Soch, 104 A.D.3d 1268, 960 N.Y.S.2d 920 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Matthew A. Rosenbaum, J.), entered April 24, 2012. The order denied plaintiffs’ motion and defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment.

[1269]*1269It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court. Present — Scudder, PJ., Peradotto, Garni, Whalen and Martoche, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Matthew A. Rosenbaum, J.), entered April 24, 2012. The order denied plaintiffs’ motion and defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment.

[1269]*1269It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court. Present — Scudder, PJ., Peradotto, Garni, Whalen and Martoche, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 A.D.3d 1268, 960 N.Y.S.2d 920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/badesha-v-soch-nyappdiv-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack