BADESHA, SANTOKH S. v. SOCH, PARMINDER S.
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
56 CA 12-01313 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, WHALEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
SANTOKH S. BADESHA, SUDARSHAN S. BAINS, BHOOPINDER S. MEHTA, HARBHAJAN S. PUREWAL, MAGHAR S. CHANA, RAJDEEP K. CHEEMA, AS MEMBERS OF BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF GURUDWARA OF ROCHESTER, AND GURUDWARA OF ROCHESTER, A CORPORATION ORGANIZED AND EXISTING UNDER RELIGIOUS CORPORATION LAW OF STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS,
V ORDER
PARMINDER S. SOCH, MANDEEP (MAKHAN) SINGH, AJAY SINGH, PUSHPINDER ANEJA, GURRINDER S. BEDI, IN HIS CAPACITY AS A MEMBER OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE GURUDWARA OF ROCHESTER, DAMAPAUL SONDHI AND SANDEEP S. GREWAL, IN THEIR CAPACITIES AS PURPORTED AUDITORS OF GURUDWARA OF ROCHESTER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.
WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, ROCHESTER (WARREN B. ROSENBAUM OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS.
HARRIS BEACH PLLC, PITTSFORD (A. VINCENT BUZARD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.
Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Matthew A. Rosenbaum, J.), entered April 24, 2012. The order denied plaintiffs’ motion and defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.
Entered: March 22, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
BADESHA, SANTOKH S. v. SOCH, PARMINDER S. (BADESHA, SANTOKH S. v. SOCH, PARMINDER S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.