Bader v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
112 N.J.L. 241
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Heher, Perskie, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bader v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 112 N.J.L. 241 (N.J. 1934).
112 N.J.L. 241 (Bader v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. Trusell
131 So. 2d 730 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1961)
Walker v. Weymouth
145 A.2d 90 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1958)
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Johnson
91 F.2d 332 (Tenth Circuit, 1937)