Bader v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
112 N.J.L. 241
This text of 112 N.J.L. 241 (Bader v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bader v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 112 N.J.L. 241 (N.J. 1934).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Heher, Perskie, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Food Fair Stores, Inc. v. Trusell
131 So. 2d 730 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1961)
Walker v. Weymouth
145 A.2d 90 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1958)
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Johnson
91 F.2d 332 (Tenth Circuit, 1937)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
112 N.J.L. 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bader-v-great-atlantic-pacific-tea-co-nj-1934.