Bader Enterprises, Inc. v. Olsen

551 P.2d 424, 92 Nev. 414, 1976 Nev. LEXIS 621
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided June 30, 1976·No. No. 8749·Published

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

This appeal, which is in progress, is from a judgment decreeing-that appellant (plaintiff below) “takes nothing by way of its complaint.”

[415]*415Respondents have neither filed their answering brief within the time prescribed by NRAP 31(a), nor have they offered any explanation for their failure to do so.

Under these circumstances, and for the same reasons stated in, and on the authority of, Kitchen Factors, Inc. v. Brown, 91 Nev. 308, 535 P.2d 677 (1975), we, sua sponte, elect to treat respondents’ unexcused and unexplained dereliction as a confession of error.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. In accord with NRS 18.060 appellant will be allowed its costs on appeal, upon the proper filing of a cost bill.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bader Enterprises, Inc. v. Olsen, 551 P.2d 424, 92 Nev. 414, 1976 Nev. LEXIS 621 (Neb. 1976).

551 P.2d 424 (Bader Enterprises, Inc. v. Olsen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kitchen Factors, Inc. v. Brown
535 P.2d 677 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1975)