Bader Enterprises, Inc. v. Olsen

551 P.2d 424, 92 Nev. 414, 1976 Nev. LEXIS 621
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedJune 30, 1976
DocketNo. 8749
StatusPublished

This text of 551 P.2d 424 (Bader Enterprises, Inc. v. Olsen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bader Enterprises, Inc. v. Olsen, 551 P.2d 424, 92 Nev. 414, 1976 Nev. LEXIS 621 (Neb. 1976).

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

This appeal, which is in progress, is from a judgment decreeing-that appellant (plaintiff below) “takes nothing by way of its complaint.”

[415]*415Respondents have neither filed their answering brief within the time prescribed by NRAP 31(a), nor have they offered any explanation for their failure to do so.

Under these circumstances, and for the same reasons stated in, and on the authority of, Kitchen Factors, Inc. v. Brown, 91 Nev. 308, 535 P.2d 677 (1975), we, sua sponte, elect to treat respondents’ unexcused and unexplained dereliction as a confession of error.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. In accord with NRS 18.060 appellant will be allowed its costs on appeal, upon the proper filing of a cost bill.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kitchen Factors, Inc. v. Brown
535 P.2d 677 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
551 P.2d 424, 92 Nev. 414, 1976 Nev. LEXIS 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bader-enterprises-inc-v-olsen-nev-1976.