Badeau v. Niles

9 Abb. N. Cas. 48
New York Supreme Court·Decided June 15, 1880·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Lawrence, J.

The motion to strike out the portions of the complaint specified in the notice of motion should, I think, be granted. The allegations objected to relate rather to the evidence by which a cause of action may be established upon the trial, than to a statement of the facts constituting a cause of action. Even under the Code I do not understand that it is proper to plead the evidence by which a cause of action is to be established. In other words, the resultant, not the evidentiary, facts should be pleaded. $10 costs to defendant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Badeau v. Niles, 9 Abb. N. Cas. 48 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1880).

9 Abb. N. Cas. 48 (Badeau v. Niles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stein v. Lyon
98 Misc. 687 (New York Supreme Court, 1917)
Williamson v. Wager
90 A.D. 186 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)
Cantner v. Auerbach
20 Misc. 281 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
Hauselt v. Fine
18 Abb. N. Cas. 142 (New York Supreme Court, 1886)