Badea v. Seneca Insurance

203 A.D.2d 98, 612 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3765
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 12, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 203 A.D.2d 98 (Badea v. Seneca Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Badea v. Seneca Insurance, 203 A.D.2d 98, 612 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3765 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered on or about June 30, 1993, which, inter alia, denied defendant and third-party defendant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

In light of the fact that the evidence presented on the motion raises material questions concerning, inter alia, whether the instant fire extinguisher was properly installed and situated in the premises and as to what caused the extinguisher to fall, summary judgment was properly denied. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Asch, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weiss v. Fire Extinguisher Services Co.
83 A.D.3d 822 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 A.D.2d 98, 612 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/badea-v-seneca-insurance-nyappdiv-1994.