Badcock v. Steadman
1 Root 87
Opinion
To this plea in bar, the plaintiff demurred; and judgment was — That tlie plea is insufficient; and the judgment of the [88]*88County Court was affirmed upon, tlie writ of error. Eor a parol condition cannot be set up to control a written security executed and delivered to tlie party liimself.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Badcock v. Steadman, 1 Root 87 (Colo. Ct. App. 1783).
1 Root 87 (Badcock v. Steadman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dils v. Bank of Pikeville
60 S.W. 715 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1901)
Hudspeth's Adm'r v. Tyler
56 S.W. 973 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1900)
Hubble v. Murphy
62 Ky. 278 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1864)
Chandler v. Chandler
21 Ark. 95 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1860)
Scott v. State Bank
4 Ark. 36 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1848)