Badall, Chrisondath

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 20, 2007·No. PD-0552-07·Published

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. PD-0552-07
CHRISONDATH BADALL, Appellant


v.



THE STATE OF TEXAS



ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE NINTH COURT OF APPEALS

LIBERTY COUNTY

Per curiam. Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.



ORDER

The petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i), because the petition does not contain a complete copy of the opinion of the court of appeals.

The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.

The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition must be filed in the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS within thirty days after the date of this order.

En banc

Filed: June 20, 2007

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Badall, Chrisondath, (Tex. 2007).

Badall, Chrisondath (Badall, Chrisondath) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.