Badalamenti v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Badalamenti v. City of New York

50 A.D.3d 477, 855 N.Y.S.2d 520

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 17, 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.3d 477 (Badalamenti v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Badalamenti v. City of New York, 50 A.D.3d 477, 855 N.Y.S.2d 520 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Paul A. Victor, J.), entered February 2, 2007, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied that part of plaintiffs’ motion to produce discovery arising from a similar accident involving identical defendants, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted and defendants directed to produce all reports relating to the Neary litigation.

The motion court erred in denying plaintiffs’ request for the production of reports arising out of and relating to the Neary case, where the pit-stop switch for the building’s elevators involved in both the subject accident and in the accident involving Neary are identical devices manufactured by defendant G.A.L. Manufacturing Corp. (see McKeon v Sears Roebuck & Co., 190 AD2d 577 [1993]).

We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Buckley, Catterson and Acosta, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Paul A. Victor, J.), entered February 2, 2007, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied that part of plaintiffs’ motion to produce discovery arising from a similar accident involving identical defendants, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted and defendants directed to produce all reports relating to the Neary litigation.

The motion court erred in denying plaintiffs’ request for the production of reports arising out of and relating to the Neary case, where the pit-stop switch for the building’s elevators involved in both the subject accident and in the accident involving Neary are identical devices manufactured by defendant G.A.L. Manufacturing Corp. (see McKeon v Sears Roebuck & Co., 190 AD2d 577 [1993]).

We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Buckley, Catterson and Acosta, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.3d 477, 855 N.Y.S.2d 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/badalamenti-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack