Bad Nauheim Properties Ltd. v. Ameropan Oil Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bad Nauheim Properties Ltd. v. Ameropan Oil Corp.

299 A.D.2d 381, 749 N.Y.S.2d 423

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 12, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 299 A.D.2d 381 (Bad Nauheim Properties Ltd. v. Ameropan Oil Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bad Nauheim Properties Ltd. v. Ameropan Oil Corp., 299 A.D.2d 381, 749 N.Y.S.2d 423 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Connell, J.), dated May 21, 2001, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal sum of $565,000.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The jury verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 133). The evidence and testimony received at trial supports the jury determination that the transfers of money between the plaintiff and the defendant were loans.

The defendant failed to sustain its burden of proving the partial bar of the statute of limitations.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either without [382]*382merit or do not require reversal. Florio, J.P., Friedmann, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI